| Profile |
|---|
| 3rd LB / 2nd RD | 6’0 / 225 | Class – JR | College – Georgia |
| Pro Comparison |
|---|
| Jayon Brown/ Devin Bush |
| Scheme |
|---|
| Will |
Grades
Overall Draft Grade: 76.2
Impact Grade
Overall – 70.7
Mike – 68.9
Will – 73.1
Hybrid – 71.3
Potential Grade
Overall – 84.5
Mike – 82.2
Will – 86.4
Hybrid – 84.8
Traits/ Skills (see bottom of the page for scale)
All potential first-round prospects are graded and analyzed through the film of at least three games dedicated to each player. In addition, an array of various stats and analytics are also factored in. All the grades for each trait are relevant to the position. Each trait/attribute is graded 1-7. The overall grade is not limited to 100 as a player like Aaron Donald is so much better than the next best player behind him, but no prospects will be rated higher than 100 for potential.
| Traits | Immediate | Potential |
| SPD | 6 | 6 |
| ACC | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| AGI | 6 | 6 |
| STR | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| IQ | 4 | 5.4 |
| MCV | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| ZCV | 4 | 5.6 |
| INS | 4 | 5 |
| BKS | 3.4 | 4.3 |
| PUR | 5.2 | 6.2 |
| TAC | 4.3 | 5.2 |
| PRM | 4.8 | 5.4 |
Player Notes
- Nakobe Dean may have been the most fun player to watch on the Georgia defense in 2021 but his pro-skill set and potential are far from what the other top prospects in that group have.
- Has the speed, instincts, and quickness to make plays all over the field
- He doesn’t have great size or strength, his pass rush moves are more than desirable; plays with a high motor
- His level of speed and agility will allow him to cover slot receivers and halfbacks down the road; played well in coverage at Georgia but didn’t do it often
- Does not project well as a mike LB in the NFL as his size and ability to take on blocks will limit him
- He has and will likely continue to struggle to cover TEs in man coverage due to his size
Combine
40 yd:
Shuttle:
10 yd:
3 cone:
Broad Jump:
Vertical:
Bench:
Arm length: 31.88
Grading Scale
Pot=Potential: players’ highest upside
Imp=Impact: player’s immediate impact
Int=Intercept: # of overall points subtracted from overall grade for a given position; the formula for each position comes up with a base overall which is then subtracted by the ‘Int’ # to get the final grade; each position’s base overall scale varies from 110-170.
| LB Scale | Traits/ Attributes | Variable | Variable | Variable |
| LB | Linebacker | MIke | Will | Hybrid |
| SPD | Speed | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.1 |
| ACC | Acceleration | 0.1 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| AGI | Agility | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.06 |
| STR | Strength | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| IQ | Intelligence | 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| MCV | Man Cov. | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| ZCV | Zone Cov. | 0.1 | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| INS | Instincts | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.1 |
| BKSH | Block-shed | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
| PUR | Pursuit | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.12 |
| TAC | Tackle | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| PRM | Pass-Rush Moves | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.1 |
| INT | -9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OVR Grade Formula | Draft Grade Formula | |
| Scheme | Age | Draft grade variable |
| MIKE – 35% | 21 | Pot=(.38) IMP=(.62) |
| WILL – 35% | 22 | Pot=(.34) IMP=(.66) |
| HYB – 30% | 23 | Pot=(.3) IMP=(.7) |
| 24 | Pot=(.26) IMP=(.74) | |
| Good-character=(+.02)POT. Bad-character=(+.02)IMP. | ||
| Injury=(+.02)IMP. in increments depending on the severity |
| LB | Scheme Definition |
| Mike | Traditional big-bodied middle-linebacker; must have run instincts, size, strength, and good tackling ability; needs solid coverage skills to man up HBs and play mid-zone reads |
| Will | Modern coverage first off-ball linebacker; Must have speed and quickness, zone instincts, good man coverage, ability to react quickly; run defense is less important, and pass-rush ability is a bonus |
| Hybrid | Balanced all-around linebackers who fit well in 3-4/4-3 hybrid defenses; Must be versatile athletes, who can defend the run well, drop into coverage, rush the passer, and make plays on the ball |
Individual trait scale (1-7):
7 – Rare world-class skill; best in the league and no room for improvement | 6 – Great-elite skill; one of the best at that given trait but still has some room to improve | 5 – Very good; above average and has potential to be elite | 4 – Average; able to suffice but, not ideal long-term | 3 – Below average; able to suffice at college level | 2 – Poor; hinders overall play and is a liability to the team | 1 – Awful; not good enough to play given position at any level above D2 | Note: Consistency plays a large factor.
Overall Draft grade scale (15-100):
85+ – Generational talent; immediate all-pro/ potential HOF. | 83-85 – Bluechip prospect; immediate star with elite upside | 81-83 – High first-round talent; high-end starter/ elite potential. | 79-81 – First rounder; Day one starter/ boom or bust (low risk). | 76-79 – Replacement level starter/ boom or bust (high risk). | 73-76 – Will become good starter with 2-3 years/ high upside project. | 70-73 – Eventual average starter. | 68-70 – Day one backup/ potential starter. | 64-68 – Depth piece/ Special teamer | 64-0 – Practice squad/ league min. level; journeymen/ longshots | QBs have +5 draft value compared to average position.
Check out the full prospect database (google spreadsheet) for more prospect grades.
Thank you to TFG and PFF for inspiring this draft content.
Recent Comments