It’s a given that every new season a handful of late-round picks or undrafted free agents will surprisingly become impactful players. While there are a lot of them this season, the one who’s impressed me the most is Seattle’s CB Tariq Woolen. He was on my radar of possible players to fully evaluate during the last draft but he didn’t show enough as a prospect to warrant making the list of 100 players. What made him stand out was his staggering 40-time paired with his size. He ran a 4.26 and while it doesn’t quite appear that way on film, he’s still fast enough to run with almost any receiver. His film in college was reportedly very poor, which explains the late draft status, but since entering the league, he’s obviously grown significantly. So far, in his rookie campaign, he’s demonstrated better quickness and footwork, while also showing a good understanding and feel for zone coverage. With four picks in just seven games, some are calling his name for the Offensive Rookie of The Year award. While he should certainly be considered, the way Sauce Gardner is playing really makes it hard as Sauce is having a truly special season. The ball skills he’s flashed have gotten many casual fans intrigued, and with his physical upside, he could very well be a big name soon. All of his strengths and weaknesses will be covered here as well as two full all-22 film breakdowns.
Profile |
---|
Drafted: 5th RD / 153rd | 6’4 / 205 | Age – 23.5 | College – Texas-San Antonio |
Pro Comparison |
---|
The Good Version of Kevin King |
Scheme |
---|
Press Man |
Week 4: @ DET
TGT: 5
REC: 3
YDS: 47
TD: 0
INT: 1
PBU: 0
Week 6: VS AZ
TGT: 7
REC: 4
YDS: 40
TD: 0
INT: 1
PBU: 0
Final conclusion
Overall, I wasn’t disappointed but nor was I overwhelmed by his performance as a rookie. For his size, he should really continue to become more physical at the line as most of his press plays he looks rather soft. His ability to recognize routes and his understanding of leverage has been greatly improved, and he continues to show subtle improvements each week. After watching every snap of those two games and analyzing all of his picks, I can confidently say he is an ascending stud corner, but it’s not clear if he’ll ever be a true star player. At worst, he’s a capable number-two corner that can start, and at best he’ll be a borderline elite corner in the right scheme.
Impact Grade
Overall – 73.7
Press – 75.3
Man – 73.9
Balanced – 73.8
Slot – 70.5
Potential Grade
Overall – 86.9
Press – 89.7
Man – 86.4
Balanced – 86.4
Slot – 83.4
All potential first-round prospects are graded and analyzed through ‘film’ of at least three games dedicated to each player. In addition, an array of various stats and analytics are also factored in. Each trait/attribute is graded 1-7.
Traits | Immediate | Potential |
SPD | 6.6 | 6.6 |
ACC | 5.4 | 5.4 |
AGI | 4.8 | 5 |
STR | 5 | 5.2 |
MAN | 4 | 5.2 |
SZC | 4 | 4.5 |
DZC | 4.8 | 5.6 |
BSK | 5.6 | 6.6 |
PRS | 4.5 | 6.2 |
IQ | 4.3 | 5.6 |
RUN | 4 | 5.4 |
TAC | 4.5 | 5.8 |
Player’s Pros and Cons
Combine
40 yd: 4.26
Shuttle:
10 yd:
3 cone:
Broad Jump:
Vertical: 42
Bench:
Arm length: 33.63
Grading Scale:
Pot=Potential: players’ highest upside
Imp=Impact: player’s immediate impact
Individual trait scale (1-7):
7 – Rare world-class skill; best in the league and no room for improvement | 6 – Great-elite skill; one of the best at that given trait but still has some room to improve | 5 – Very good; above average and has potential to be elite | 4 – Average; able to suffice but, not ideal long-term | 3 – Below average; able to suffice at college level | 2 – Poor; hinders overall play and is a liability to the team | 1 – Awful; not good enough to play given position at any level above D2 | Note: Consistency plays a large factor.
Overall Draft grade scale (15-100):
85+ – Generational talent; immediate all-pro/ potential HOF. | 83-85 – Bluechip prospect; immediate star with elite upside | 81-83 – High first-round talent; high-end starter/ elite potential. | 79-81 – First rounder; Day one starter/ boom or bust (low risk). | 76-79 – Replacement level starter/ boom or bust (high risk). | 73-76 – Will become good starter with 2-3 years/ high upside project. | 70-73 – Eventual average starter. | 68-70 – Day one backup/ potential starter. | 64-68 – Depth piece/ Special teamer | 64-0 – Practice squad/ league min. level; journeymen/ longshots | QBs have +5 draft value compared to average position.
Luther Burden III was at the top of everyone's draft boards entering the season. That…
When I watched Bijan Robinson in the 2023 NFL draft, I genuinely believed he was…
Sometimes, you develop an instant crush when you watch an NFL prospect for the first…
Before this current college season, I saw a decent bit of play from Jalen Milroe…
After Darrell Revis, the league hadn't seen a player with the pedigree of being a…
We've seen Receivers of all different shapes and sizes over the past years, but few…
This website uses cookies.