Categories: NFL Draft

NFL 2022 Draft – CB Derek Stingley Jr. Scouting Report

Profile
1st CB / Top 5   |   6’1 / 190   |   Class – JR   |   College – LSU
Pro Comparison
Marshon Lattimore
Scheme
Any/ Man

Grades

Overall Draft Grade: 82.5

Impact Grade

Overall – 76.5

Press – 76.5

Man – 78.5

Balanced – 75.8

Slot – 73.9

Potential Grade

Overall – 94.2

Press – 94.7

Man – 95.8

Balanced – 93.7

Slot – 91.2

Traits/ Skills (see bottom of the page for scale)

All potential first-round prospects are graded and analyzed through ‘film’ of at least three games dedicated to each player. In addition, an array of various stats and analytics are also factored in. Each trait/attribute is graded 1-7.

TraitsImmediatePotential
SPD6.26.2
ACC6.46.4
AGI66.2
MAN4.36.4
SZC3.65
DZC46
BSK5.86.4
PRS4.86.2
IQ34.8
RUN3.85
TAC34.8

Player Notes

CB Derek Stingley Jr. Bio

  • Derek Stingley is one of the most talented DB prospects from the past decade; has elite makeup speed, fluid quickness, and outstanding ball skills
  • A combination of height, press, and speed makes him a great answer to vertical threats
  • Very sticky in man coverage, pairs it well with excellent timing in press
  • Has the range to be elite in zone coverage, but gets confused and lost in zone coverage too often; has plenty of time to improve but would play best in a man-heavy scheme
  • Isn’t necessarily afraid to tackle, but needs to significantly improve his technique
  • Missed time in 2020 (leg) and 2021 (foot) due to injury

Combine

40 yd:

Shuttle:

10 yd:

3 cone:

Broad Jump:

Vertical:

Bench:

Arm length: 30.63

Hands: 9.63


Grading Scale

Pot=Potential: players’ highest upside

Imp=Impact: player’s immediate impact

Int=Intercept: # of overall points subtracted from overall grade for a given position; the formula for each position comes up with a base overall which is then subtracted by the ‘Int’ # to get the final grade; each position’s base overall scale varies from 110-170.

CB ScaleTraits/ AttributesVariableVariableVariableVariable
CBCornerbackPressManBalancedSlot
SPDSpeed0.210.190.160.14
ACCAcceleration0.160.180.180.18
AGIAgility0.090.160.160.15
MANMan C.0.120.240.160.14
SZCShallow Zone C.0.040.060.080.18
DZCDeep Zone C.0.180.080.150.04
BSKBall skills0.10.080.10.09
PRSPress0.20.150.080.09
IQIQ0.080.050.120.08
INSRun Defense0.040.040.040.1
TACTackle0.030.020.020.06
INT-131.251.251.251.25
OVR
Grade Formula
Draft Grade
Formula
SchemeAgeDraft grade variable
MAN – 28%21Pot=(.38) IMP=(.62)
PRS – 28%22Pot=(.34) IMP=(.66)
BAL – 28%23Pot=(.3) IMP=(.7)
SLO –
16%
24Pot=(.26) IMP=(.74)
Good-character=(+.02)POT. Bad-character=(+.02)IMP.
Injury=(+.02)IMP. in increments depending on the severity
CBScheme Definition
Press-
Cover 3
A press-heavy scheme that depends on long and physical corners that have good straight-line speed; uses primarily cover 3 and variations of press-man coverage.
ManA man-heavy scheme that depends on all-around great athletes that play best in man coverage; uses a variation of press-man and off-ball man coverage.
Balanced-
Split safety
A split-safety scheme that depends on quick and instinctive corners that don’t have great press ability but have solid ball skills; uses primarily quarters coverage which is essentially man coverage for the DBs on most plays; cover 2 and cover 2-shell are also used in this scheme.
SlotThe traditional nickel-corner position needed in every defense; has good lateral agility and quickness, while also having good run defense and tackling. Is able to cover slot receivers and TEs one-on-one and has good zone instincts.

Individual trait scale (1-7):

7 – Rare world-class skill; best in the league and no room for improvement   |   6 – Great-elite skill; one of the best at that given trait but still has some room to improve   |   5 – Very good; above average and has potential to be elite   |   4 – Average; able to suffice but, not ideal long-term   |   3 – Below average; able to suffice at college level   |   2 – Poor; hinders overall play and is a liability to the team   |   1 – Awful; not good enough to play given position at any level above D2 | Note: Consistency plays a large factor.

Overall Draft grade scale (15-100):

85+ – Generational talent; immediate all-pro/ potential HOF.   |   83-85 – Bluechip prospect; immediate star with elite upside   |   81-83 – High first-round talent; high-end starter/ elite potential.   |   79-81 – First rounder; Day one starter/ boom or bust (low risk).   |   76-79 – Replacement level starter/ boom or bust (high risk).   |   73-76 – Will become good starter with 2-3 years/ high upside project.   | 70-73 – Eventual average starter.   |   68-70 – Day one backup/ potential starter.   |   64-68 – Depth piece/ Special teamer  |   64-0 – Practice squad/ league min. level; journeymen/ longshots | QBs have +5 draft value compared to average position.

Check out the full prospect database (google spreadsheet) for more prospect grades.

Thank you to TFG and PFF for inspiring this draft content.

Trey Schneider

Recent Posts

WR Luther Burden III Prospect Deep Dive: Why The Playmaker is Perfect For a Shanahan Style Offense

Luther Burden III was at the top of everyone's draft boards entering the season. That…

4 days ago

RB Ashton Jeanty Prospect Deep Dive: How Can a Man be This Good at Football?

When I watched Bijan Robinson in the 2023 NFL draft, I genuinely believed he was…

3 weeks ago

SA Malaki Starks Prospect Deep Dive: A Rare Kind of Athlete With One Simple Flaw

Sometimes, you develop an instant crush when you watch an NFL prospect for the first…

4 weeks ago

QB Jalen Milroe Prospect Deep Dive: Is The Heisman Candidate a Legitimate Top-Ten Talent?

Before this current college season, I saw a decent bit of play from Jalen Milroe…

1 month ago

CB Will Johnson Prospect Deep Dive: Could The Former Five Star Be a True Lockdown Corner?

After Darrell Revis, the league hadn't seen a player with the pedigree of being a…

1 month ago

WR Tetairoa McMillan Prospect Deep Dive: Why He Is One Of The Most Unique Players Of Our Generation

We've seen Receivers of all different shapes and sizes over the past years, but few…

2 months ago

This website uses cookies.