Profile |
---|
4th WR / 1st RD | 6’2 / 225 | Class – JR | College – Arkansas |
Pro Comparison |
---|
AJ Brown |
Scheme |
---|
Physical/ Slot |
Grades
Overall Draft Grade: 79.4
Overall – 73.7
Impact Grade
Potential Grade
Overall – 87.8
Traits/ Skills (see bottom of the page for scale)
All potential first-round prospects are graded and analyzed through ‘film’ of at least three games dedicated to each player. In addition, an array of various stats and analytics are also factored in. Each trait/attribute is graded 1-7.
Traits | Immediate | Potential |
SPD | 6 | 6 |
ACC | 5.6 | 5.8 |
AGI | 5.6 | 5.6 |
STR | 6.2 | 6.2 |
VER | 5 | 5 |
OCA | 5.2 | 6.2 |
CIT | 5 | 5.8 |
CTC | 5.4 | 6.2 |
REL | 4 | 5.2 |
SRR | 3.8 | 4.8 |
MRR | 4.3 | 5.6 |
DRR | 4.3 | 5.4 |
RAC | 6 | 6.4 |
IQ | 4 | 5.8 |
SEC | 5.6 | 6.4 |
Player Notes
- Treylon Burks is built to play receiver in the modern play action style offense as it would capitalize on his speed, physicality and RAC ability
- The combination of speed, size, and physical playstyle makes him very difficult for DBs to tackle
- Very solid possession receiver; has aggressive ball skills and doesn’t have a bad drop issue
- Isn’t a refined route runner and doesn’t have a great change of direction; has plenty of time to improve and wouldn’t be an issue if paired with a coach like Kyle Shanahan
- Above-average run-blocker and could improve with a better effort
- Didn’t run a great 40, but didn’t have good technique out of the stance is also less affected by pad weight than the average player
Combine
40 yd: 4.55
10 yd: 1.57
Shuttle:
3 cone: 7.28
Vertical: 33
Broad: 122
Bench:
Arm L: 33.5
Hands: 9.88
Grading Scale
Pot=Potential: players’ highest upside
Imp=Impact: player’s immediate impact
Int=Intercept: # of overall points subtracted from overall grade for a given position; the formula for each position comes up with a base overall which is then subtracted by the ‘Int’ # to get the final grade; each position’s base overall scale varies from 110-140.
WR | Traites/ attributes | Variable # | Draft Grade Formula | |
SPD | Speed | 0.16 | Age-21: | Pot=(.4) IMP=(.6) |
ACC | Acceleration | 0.16 | Age-22: | Pot=(.36) IMP=(.64) |
AGI | Agility | 0.12 | Age-23: | Pot=(.32) IMP=(.68) |
STR | Strength | 0.02 | Age-24: | Pot=(.28) IMP=(.72) |
VER | Vertical | 0.02 | ||
OCA | Open Catch | 0.09 | ||
CIT | Catch In Traffic | 0.08 | ||
CTC | Contested Catch | 0.11 | ||
REL | Release | 0.14 | ||
SRR | Short Route R. | 0.08 | ||
MRR | Intermediate Route R. | 0.12 | ||
DRR | Deep Route R. | 0.1 | ||
RAC | Run After Catch | 0.12 | ||
IQ | Intelligence | 0.05 | ||
SEC | Ball Security | 0.03 | ||
INT | Intercept #: -28 | Sum: 1.4 |
Individual trait scale (1-7):
7 – Rare world-class skill; best in the league and no room for improvement | 6 – Great-elite skill; one of the best at that given trait but still has some room to improve | 5 – Very good; above average and has potential to be elite | 4 – Average; able to suffice but, not ideal long-term | 3 – Below average; able to suffice at college level | 2 – Poor; hinders overall play and is a liability to the team | 1 – Awful; not good enough to play given position at any level above D2 | Note: Consistency plays a large factor.
Overall Draft grade scale (15-100):
85+ – Generational talent; immediate all-pro/ potential HOF. | 83-85 – Bluechip prospect; immediate star with elite upside | 81-83 – High first-round talent; high-end starter/ elite potential. | 79-81 – First rounder; Day one starter/ boom or bust (low risk). | 77-79 – Replacement level starter/ boom or bust (high risk). | 75-77 – Will become good starter with 2-3 years/ high upside project. | 73-75 – Eventual average starter. | 71-73 – Day one backup/ potential starter. | 67-71 – Depth piece/ Special teamer | 67-0 – Practice squad/ league min. level; journeymen/ longshots | QBs have +5 draft value compared to average postion.
Recent Comments