| Profile |
|---|
| 5th QB / 2nd RD | 6’3 / 226 | Class – JR (RS) | College – Nevada |
| Pro Comparison |
|---|
| Jared Goff (+) |
| Scheme |
|---|
| Pro |
Grades
Overall Draft Grade: 71.6
Impact Grade
Overall – 68.3
Pro – 67.4
Spread – 68.7
Play-Action – 68.8
Potential Grade
Overall – 84.8
Pro – 86.4
Spread – 84.5
Play-Action – 83.4
Traits/ Skills (see bottom of the page for scale)
All potential first-round prospects are graded and analyzed through ‘film’ of at least three games dedicated to each player. In addition, an array of various stats and analytics are also factored in. Each trait/attribute is graded 1-7.
| Traits | Immediate | Potential |
| SPD | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| ACC | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| AGI | 4 | 4 |
| ARM | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| REL | 6.4 | 6.8 |
| TWM | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| TUP | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| SAC | 5.6 | 6.4 |
| MAC | 5 | 6 |
| DAC | 4.8 | 6 |
| PRC | 3.8 | 5.4 |
| DEC | 4.3 | 5.4 |
| PA | 5 | 6.2 |
| SPR | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| ELU | 4.5 | 4.8 |
| SEC | 5.2 | 6.2 |
Player Notes
- Carson Strong has elite arm talent; not only in arm strength but with his release as well
- Has great ball placement downfield and had very few turnover-worthy plays in his final season
- Had to have knee surgery twice, I explain more in my mock draft, would be a top ten-five pick otherwise
- Mobility isn’t a plus, but is good enough to maneuver the pocket well; needs to play more confident in the pocket in the pros
Combine
40 yd:
20 yd:
3 cone:
Bench:
Hand Size: 9.25″
Grading Scale
Pot=Potential: players’ highest upside
Imp=Impact: player’s immediate impact
Int=Intercept: # of overall points subtracted from overall grade for a given position; the formula for each position comes up with a base overall which is then subtracted by the ‘Int’ # to get the final grade; each position’s base overall scale varies from 110-140.
| QB Scale | Scheme/ Variable | Scheme/ Variable | Scheme/ Variable | |
| QB | Traits/ Attributes | PRO | SPREAD | PLAY-ACTION |
| SPD | Speed | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| ACC | Acceleration | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
| AGI | Agility | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| ARM | Arm Strength | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| REL | Release | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.08 |
| TWM | Throw while moving | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| TUP | Throw under pressure | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| SAC | Short Accuracy | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| MAC | Intermediate Accuracy | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.2 |
| DAC | Deep Accuracy | 0.17 | 0.1 | 0.13 |
| PRC | Processing | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.09 |
| DEC | Decision Making | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| PA | Play Action | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| SPR | Sense Pressure | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.06 |
| ELU | Elusiveness | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| SEC | Ball Security | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| INT | Intercept #: -56 | Sum=1.7 | Note: | Scheme grades are averaged out |
| Draft Grade Formula | |
| Age-21: | Pot=(.36) IMP=(.64) |
| Age-22: | Pot=(.32) IMP=(.68) |
| Age-23: | Pot=(.28) IMP=(.72) |
| Age-24: | Pot=(.24) IMP=(.76) |
Individual trait scale (1-7):
7 – Rare world-class skill; best in the league and no room for improvement | 6 – Great-elite skill; one of the best at that given trait but still has some room to improve | 5 – Very good; above average and has potential to be elite | 4 – Average; able to suffice but, not ideal long-term | 3 – Below average; able to suffice at college level | 2 – Poor; hinders overall play and is a liability to the team | 1 – Awful; not good enough to play given position at any level above D2 | Note: Consistency plays a large factor.
Overall Draft grade scale (15-100):
87+ – Generational talent; immediate all-pro/ potential HOF. | 83-87 – Bluechip prospect; immediate star with elite upside | 80-83 – High first-round talent; high-end starter/ elite potential. | 78-80 – First rounder; high-end starter/ boom or bust (low risk). | 76-78 – Low-end starter w/ star potential/ boom or bust. | 73-76 – Replacement Level starter/ high-upside project. | 69-73 – Longterm backup/ potential high-end starter. | 69-64 – Depth piece/ potential starter | 64-0 – Practice squad/ league min. level; journeymen/ longshots
Recent Comments