Will Levis is a very exciting prospect but there also carries great risk with taking him in the early first round. He turned out to be a tough eval for the most part because his team is so bad compared to the competition he faced in the 2022 season. He doesn’t exactly play in a system that’s conducive to his skillset at Kentucky either and this has led to some ugly play. Due to playcalling, he had limited opportunities on traditional passes, but many snaps were analyzed. You can still make out how insane his potential is as he is a talented runner with an outstanding arm. Why his arm talent is so incredible will be broken down here. Once the combine unfolds, we’ll have a more accurate understanding of his athleticism and his draft status as well. Just based on how Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson have had success, it’s looking likely someone will love his upside and take him in the top 10-15 area. He certainly has bust potential, but it’s gonna be hard not to take a chance on him in the top ten if his character is good. Five games have been evaluated and all of his strengths and weaknesses will be broken down here. Keep in mind the grading scale has been slightly updated from the past draft and players are now graded slightly harsher than before. This is because current NFL players have now been graded using the same scale and a greater disparity must be established. Alongside the film, a lot of analytics have gone into making this scouting report such as PFF grades. Please leave your feedback on Twitter @FBIntellect.
Profile |
---|
3rd QB / Top Ten | 6’3 / 232 | Class – SR | College – Kentucky |
Pro Comparison |
---|
Trey Lance With Better Mechanics |
Scheme |
---|
Play Action/ Spread |
Overall Draft Grade: 74.8
Impact Grade
Overall – 69.7
Pro – 66.0
Spread – 71.6
Play-Action – 71.5
Potential Grade
Overall – 89.4
Pro – 88.5
Spread – 89.8
Play-Action – 89.8
All potential first-round prospects are graded and analyzed through ‘film’ of at least three games dedicated to each player. In addition, an array of various stats and analytics are also factored in. Each trait/attribute is graded 1-7.
Traits | Immediate | Potential |
SPD | 5.6 | 5.6 |
ACC | 5.4 | 5.4 |
AGI | 5.4 | 5.4 |
ARM | 6.6 | 6.6 |
REL | 6.4 | 6.8 |
TWM | 5.6 | 6.4 |
TUP | 4.5 | 5.8 |
SAC | 5 | 5.8 |
MAC | 4.8 | 6 |
DAC | 4.8 | 6.2 |
PRC | 4 | 5.6 |
DEC | 3.8 | 5.4 |
PA | 4.5 | 5.6 |
SPR | 3.8 | 5 |
ELU | 5.4 | 6 |
SEC | 4.8 | 6 |
This clip above is just one example of how incredible Levis’s arm strength is. The throw travels approximately 44.5 yards in the air (the diagonal distance was calculated) and takes approximately 1.88 seconds to reach the target from the point of release. This throw would be just under an average of 48.5 mph traveling speed, which is insane on that deep of a pass.
In this one, he demonstrates good escapability by evading the rusher and then shows excellent top-end speed.
Levis in this clip moves off his first read and makes a big-time decision. The accuracy was on point as well. What could be improved in this rep, is his pocket awareness.
2022 (through WK 11):
COM% – 66.0
YDS – 2,033
TD – 16
INT – 9
Pros
Cons
Combine
40 yd:
10 yd:
Shuttle:
3 cone:
Bench:
Hand Size: 10 5/8
Grading Scale
Pot=Potential: players’ highest upside
Imp=Impact: player’s immediate impact
QB Scale |
---|
SPD – Speed ACC – Acceleration AGI – Agility ARM – Arm Strength REL – Throwing Release TWM – Throw While Moving (off-platform) TUP – Throw Under Pressure SAC – Short Accuracy MAC – Medium Accuracy DAC – Deep Accuracy PRC – Processor DEC – Decision Making PA – Play Action SPR – Sense Pressure ELU – Elusiveness (combination of power, balance, and elusiveness) SEC – Ball security |
Draft Grade Formula | |
Age: 21-22: | Pot=(28%) IMP=(72%) |
Age: 23-24: | Pot=(26%) IMP=(74%) |
Age:-25+: | Pot=(24%) IMP=(76%) |
Good/ bad character: | Pot=(+3%/-3%) IMP=(-3%/+3%) |
Injury: | Pot=(-1%) in increments |
Individual trait scale (1-7):
7 – Rare world-class skill; best in the league and no room for improvement | 6 – Great-elite skill; one of the best at that given trait but still has some room to improve | 5 – Very good; above average and has potential to be elite | 4 – Average; able to suffice but, not ideal long-term | 3 – Below average; able to suffice at college level | 2 – Poor; hinders overall play and is a liability to the team | 1 – Awful; not good enough to play given position at any level above D2 | Note: Consistency plays a large factor.
Overall Draft grade scale (15-100):
84 – Perfect prospect | 81 – Bluechip prospect | 80 – Likely all-pro | 79 – Day one quality starter or superstar potential | 78 – Day one starter w/ all-pro upside | 77 – Day one starter w/ high-end upside | 76 – Boom or bust | 75 – Will become quality starter within 2-3 years
Thank you to TFG and PFF for inspiring this draft content.
Luther Burden III was at the top of everyone's draft boards entering the season. That…
When I watched Bijan Robinson in the 2023 NFL draft, I genuinely believed he was…
Sometimes, you develop an instant crush when you watch an NFL prospect for the first…
Before this current college season, I saw a decent bit of play from Jalen Milroe…
After Darrell Revis, the league hadn't seen a player with the pedigree of being a…
We've seen Receivers of all different shapes and sizes over the past years, but few…
This website uses cookies.